1985 Audi 200 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1985 Audi 200. (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | CTS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |