1985 Audi 200 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 568 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 200. (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 200. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak has automatic transmission and 1985 Audi 200 has manual transmission. 1985 Audi 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 200 | Kodiak |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 820 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2000 mm |