1985 Audi 200 vs. 2006 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2006 Nissan Frontier is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,501 cc, 2006 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Nissan Frontier is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Frontier. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Frontier. (235 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2006 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Frontier |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2142 cc | 2501 cc |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3200 mm |