1985 Audi 200 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,436 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 236 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | 200 | Condor |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2436 cc |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1646 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |
