1985 Audi 200 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 498 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS. 1985 Audi 200 has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Audi 200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | CTS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 83.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1788 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |