1985 Audi 200 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (180 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (252 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Audi 200 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | 200 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |
