1985 Audi 200 vs. 2012 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2012 Nissan Rogue is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 196 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
Because 1985 Audi 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2012 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 200 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4656 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2690 mm |