1985 Audi 200 vs. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi 200 (200 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Suzuki Kizashi. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Suzuki Kizashi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 220 kg more than 1985 Audi 200.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi 200 (258 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Kizashi. (230 Nm). This means 1985 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Kizashi.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 200 | 2012 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | 200 | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |