1985 Audi 80 vs. 1963 Riley One-Point-Five
To start off, 1985 Audi 80 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Riley One-Point-Five is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Riley One-Point-Five (62 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1985 Audi 80. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Riley One-Point-Five should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Riley One-Point-Five weights approximately 5 kg more than 1985 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Riley One-Point-Five is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Riley One-Point-Five (112 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Riley One-Point-Five will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 80 | 1963 Riley One-Point-Five | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | 80 | One-Point-Five |
Year Released | 1985 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 25 L |