1985 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1985 Audi 80. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Audi 80.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi 80 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | CTS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 259 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |