1985 Audi Coupe vs. 1966 Marcos 1800
To start off, 1985 Audi Coupe is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Marcos 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Marcos 1800 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1985 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Audi Coupe (136 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1966 Marcos 1800. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1966 Marcos 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Audi Coupe weights approximately 252 kg more than 1966 Marcos 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Marcos 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Marcos 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Audi Coupe (176 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Marcos 1800. (149 Nm). This means 1985 Audi Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Marcos 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Audi Coupe | 1966 Marcos 1800 | |
Make | Audi | Marcos |
Model | Coupe | 1800 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 149 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1022 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2280 mm |