1985 Austin Maestro vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Austin Maestro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Austin Maestro (66 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Austin Maestro weights approximately 268 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Austin Maestro | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Austin | MCC |
Model | Maestro | Smart |
Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 918 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |