1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1960 Skoda 1200
To start off, 1985 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Skoda 1200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Skoda 1200 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1960 Skoda 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Skoda 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 1960 Skoda 1200 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Skoda |
| Model | A 112 | 1200 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 38 L |
