1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1985 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 965 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Autobianchi A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Autobianchi | DAF |
| Model | A 112 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 33 L |
