1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1968 Ford 17
To start off, 1985 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Ford 17 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford 17 weights approximately 396 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1968 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 1968 Ford 17 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
| Model | A 112 | 17 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1056 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 55 L |
