1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1983 BMW 628
To start off, 1985 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 628 would be higher. At 2,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 BMW 628 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1983 BMW 628 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 BMW 628. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 1983 BMW 628 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | BMW |
| Model | A 112 | 628 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2788 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 181 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |
