1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1986 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1986 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Skoda Rapid R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Skoda Rapid R weights approximately 190 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1986 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 1986 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Autobianchi | Skoda |
Model | A 112 | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1985 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 47 L |