1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | A 112 | SL |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1755 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |
