1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Westfield |
Model | A 112 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2320 mm |