1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1052 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |