1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 4,200 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1056 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
| Model | A 112 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 4200 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1716 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 144 L |
