1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2008 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Ranger weights approximately 776 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2008 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 2008 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |