1985 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 407 kg more than 1985 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Volkswagen |
| Model | A 112 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1067 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1682 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2470 mm |
