1985 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1985 Bentley Mulsanne is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1985 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Bentley Mulsanne | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Bentley | Dodge |
Model | Mulsanne | Omni |
Year Released | 1985 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2530 mm |