1985 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 799 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 1985 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 Bentley Mulsanne has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Bentley Mulsanne will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Bentley Mulsanne | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Bentley | Volvo |
Model | Mulsanne | C30 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2639 mm |