1985 BMW 316 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 BMW 316 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP) has 304 more horse power than 1985 BMW 316. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1985 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 730 kg more than 1985 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 BMW 316 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 316 | F-Type |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 390 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2390 mm |