1985 BMW 324 vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 BMW 324. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 BMW 324 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 BMW 324 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1985 BMW 324. (85 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1985 BMW 324. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 110 kg more than 1985 BMW 324. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 BMW 324. (152 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 BMW 324.
Compare all specifications:
1985 BMW 324 | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | BMW | Tata |
Model | 324 | E |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2810 mm |