1985 BMW 628 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1985 BMW 628 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 BMW 628 weights approximately 144 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1985 BMW 628 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 BMW 628. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 BMW 628 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | 628 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1985 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2788 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2680 mm |