1985 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2004 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2004 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 430 kg more than 2004 Ford Transit Connect.
Because 1985 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Bristol Beaufighter | 2004 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Beaufighter | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1752 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2670 mm |