1985 Buick Estate vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Buick Estate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Buick Estate would be higher. At 6,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Buick Estate is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1985 Buick Estate. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1985 Buick Estate.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Buick Estate. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Buick Estate (435 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 1985 Buick Estate will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Buick Estate | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | Estate | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6598 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 222 HP |
| Torque | 435 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2550 mm |
