1985 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC
To start off, 1985 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC (105 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC should accelerate faster than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC weights approximately 364 kg more than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Buick Skyhawk | 1958 Mercedes-Benz SC | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skyhawk | SC |
Year Released | 1985 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |