1985 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1976 Volvo 240
To start off, 1985 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 240 weights approximately 254 kg more than 1985 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1976 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Buick Skyhawk | 1976 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skyhawk | 240 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |