1985 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1980 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1985 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1980 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 74 kg more than 1985 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1980 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Buick Skyhawk | 1980 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skyhawk | Commodore |
Year Released | 1985 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1890 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |