1985 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Mustang (256 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 396 kg more than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Buick Skyhawk | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Skyhawk | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |
