1985 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 346 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Buick Skyhawk | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Buick | MCC |
| Model | Skyhawk | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1810 mm |
