1985 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 629 kg more than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Skyhawk | Mustang |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |