1985 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 735 kg more than 1985 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Buick Skyhawk | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Skyhawk | CTS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1821 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2880 mm |
