1985 Buick Wildcat vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Buick Wildcat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Buick Wildcat would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Buick Wildcat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Buick Wildcat (355 HP) has 261 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Buick Wildcat should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1985 Buick Wildcat is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Buick Wildcat will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 Buick Wildcat has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Buick Wildcat will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Buick Wildcat | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Wildcat | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3785 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |