1985 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1997 Ford Royale
To start off, 1997 Ford Royale is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1985 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Cadillac Brougham | 1997 Ford Royale | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Royale |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2560 mm |
