1985 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1997 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1997 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1985 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Cadillac Brougham | 1997 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Brougham | Colt |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2430 mm |
