1985 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 684 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 1985 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Cadillac Brougham | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Brougham | HHR |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 2201 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1266 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2640 mm |
