1985 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2010 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 337 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1985 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Cadillac Brougham | 2010 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Brougham | Impala |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1613 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1852 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2807 mm |
