1985 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1985 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 1985 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 694 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 Cadillac Cimarron has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus 25 has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Cadillac Cimarron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Cadillac Cimarron | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Cimarron | 25 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 456 kg |