1985 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron (297 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm). This means 1985 Cadillac Cimarron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Cadillac Cimarron | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Cimarron | 140 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 297 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |
