1985 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1990 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1990 Ford Tempo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1990 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron (297 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 1985 Cadillac Cimarron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Cadillac Cimarron | 1990 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 297 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
