1985 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1985 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1985 Cadillac Cimarron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Cadillac Cimarron (297 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1985 Cadillac Cimarron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Cadillac Cimarron | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Cimarron | Epica |
Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 297 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |