1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1985 Caterham 1700 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 135 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 637 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Caterham 1700. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Caterham 1700 | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Caterham | Jeep |
| Model | 1700 | CJ |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 326 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 543 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2060 mm |
