1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1985 Caterham 1700 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Caterham 1700 (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 767 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Caterham 1700 | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 1700 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2782 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 543 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2960 mm |
