1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 1978 Chrysler 160
To start off, 1985 Caterham 1700 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Caterham 1700 (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 542 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Caterham 1700 (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1985 Caterham 1700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Caterham 1700 | 1978 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Caterham | Chrysler |
Model | 1700 | 160 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 543 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2680 mm |