1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 1982 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1985 Caterham 1700 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Caterham 1700 (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 787 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 165 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Caterham 1700 | 1982 Daihatsu Taft | |
| Make | Caterham | Daihatsu |
| Model | 1700 | Taft |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 543 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2030 mm |
